Held–Suarez forcing
Introduction
HeldSuarez implements the Held & Suarez (1994) benchmark forcing — the standard idealised test case for atmospheric dynamical cores. It replaces all physical parameterisations (radiation, convection, boundary layer) with two simple analytic terms:
- Newtonian relaxation of temperature toward a prescribed radiative-equilibrium profile, and
- Rayleigh friction that damps the winds in the boundary layer.
Coupled to a dynamical core, this forcing produces a realistic mid-latitude jet and eddy field without any expensive physics, which is exactly why it is the canonical benchmark for testing and intercomparing dynamical cores.
HeldSuarez is a TendencyComponent: it returns tendencies of temperature and the horizontal winds.
Physics
Thermal relaxation
Temperature is relaxed toward the equilibrium profile \(T_{\text{eq}}\) at a latitude- and height-dependent rate \(k_T\):
\[ \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}ight)_{\text{HS}} = -k_T(\phi, \sigma)\,\big(T - T_{\text{eq}}(\phi, p)\big). \]
The equilibrium temperature combines a horizontal gradient (set by the equator–pole temperature difference \(\Delta T_y\)) and a vertical stratification (set by \(\Delta\theta_z\)), floored at 200 K:
\[ T_{\text{eq}} = \max\!\left[\,200,\; \left(315 - \Delta T_y\,\sin^2\phi - \Delta\theta_z\,\log\!\tfrac{p}{p_0}\,\cos^2\phiight)\left(\tfrac{p}{p_0}ight)^{\kappa}\,ight], \]
with \(\kappa = R_d/c_p\). The relaxation rate is fast near the surface in the tropics and slow in the free atmosphere:
\[ k_T = k_a + (k_s - k_a)\,\max\!\left(0, \tfrac{\sigma - \sigma_b}{1 - \sigma_b}ight)\cos^4\phi, \]
where \(\sigma = p/p_s\).
Rayleigh friction
The winds are damped within the boundary layer (\(\sigma > \sigma_b\)) at rate \(k_v\):
\[ \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t}ight)_{\text{HS}} = -k_v(\sigma)\,\mathbf{v}, \qquad k_v = k_f\,\max\!\left(0, \tfrac{\sigma - \sigma_b}{1 - \sigma_b}ight). \]
Above the boundary layer \(k_v = 0\), leaving the free-atmosphere flow frictionless.
Constructor
climt.HeldSuarez(sigma_boundary_layer_top=0.7,
k_f=1/86400.0,
k_a=1/40.0/86400.0,
k_s=1/4.0/86400.0,
equator_pole_temperature_difference=60,
delta_theta_z=10)| Argument | Default | Symbol | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
sigma_boundary_layer_top |
0.7 |
\(\sigma_b\) | Top of the boundary layer in \(\sigma\); friction and enhanced thermal relaxation act below it. |
k_f |
1/86400 s⁻¹ |
\(k_f\) | Rayleigh friction rate (1 day⁻¹). |
k_a |
1/(40{\cdot}86400) s⁻¹ |
\(k_a\) | Free-atmosphere thermal relaxation rate (1/40 day⁻¹). |
k_s |
1/(4{\cdot}86400) s⁻¹ |
\(k_s\) | Surface tropical thermal relaxation rate (1/4 day⁻¹). |
equator_pole_temperature_difference |
60 |
\(\Delta T_y\) | Equilibrium equator–pole temperature contrast (K). |
delta_theta_z |
10 |
\(\Delta\theta_z\) | Equilibrium vertical potential-temperature contrast (K). |
The reference pressure \(p_0\), \(c_p\) and \(R_d\) come from climt’s registered constants (reference_air_pressure, etc.).
State
| Role | Quantity | Dims | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| in | eastward_wind, northward_wind |
[*, mid_levels] |
m s^-1 |
| in | air_temperature |
[*, mid_levels] |
degK |
| in | air_pressure |
[*, mid_levels] |
Pa |
| in | surface_air_pressure |
[*] |
Pa |
| in | latitude |
[*] |
degrees_north |
| tendency | eastward_wind, northward_wind |
[*, mid_levels] |
m s^-2 |
| tendency | air_temperature |
[*, mid_levels] |
degK s^-1 |
HeldSuarez has no diagnostics — it returns only tendencies.
Example
import climt
from climt import get_default_state, get_grid
forcing = climt.HeldSuarez()
state = get_default_state([forcing], grid_state=get_grid(nx=32, ny=16, nz=20))
tendencies, diagnostics = forcing(state)
print(tendencies["air_temperature"].values.shape)In a full benchmark run, HeldSuarez is coupled to a dynamical core (the component supplies the physics tendencies; the dynamical core advances the state).
Source
- Component:
climt/_components/held_suarez.py
Reference
Held, I. M. & Suarez, M. J. (1994). A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 75, 1825–1830.